← 返回今日
人工智能版权MidJourney媒体与娱乐法律

Midjourney希望好莱坞制片厂披露其AI使用的详细信息

正在面临迪士尼、环球和华纳兄弟版权侵权诉讼的AI公司Midjourney,正在寻求强制这些制片厂在证据开示过程中披露其自身的AI使用情况。这家人工智能初创公司认为,法官此前将证据开示范围限制在仅"面向消费者"内容的裁决不公平地限制了其辩护能力,而制片厂则称这一请求是"钓鱼式取证"。

核心要点

  • 迪士尼、环球和华纳兄弟起诉Midjourney,指控其使用他们的版权角色(如巴特·辛普森和达斯·维德)来训练图像生成AI
  • Midjourney认为制片厂应披露他们是否将AI用于故事板等内部用途,这可能证明行业习惯于在无许可的情况下训练版权内容
  • 一名法官此前裁决制片厂只需披露产生"面向消费者"内容的AI使用情况,Midjourney目前正在寻求推翻这一限制
  • 制片厂的首席律师David Singer称Midjourney的文件请求是"钓鱼式取证",并表示制片厂并不寻求关闭AI技术
  • 制片厂坚称他们只希望Midjourney停止未经授权复制、分发其角色并创作包含其角色的衍生作品

证据包尚未生成

信息源:TechCrunch AI

全文 · 原文

默认展示原文,不触发翻译

Midjourney wants Hollywood studios to reveal the details of their AI usage | TechCrunch TechCrunch Desktop Logo TechCrunch Mobile Logo Latest Startups Venture Apple Security AI Apps Disrupt 2026 Events Podcasts Newsletters Search Submit Site Search Toggle Mega Menu Toggle Topics Latest AI Amazon Apps Biotech & Health Climate Cloud Computing Commerce Crypto Enterprise EVs Fintech Fundraising Gadgets Gaming Google Government & Policy Hardware Instagram Layoffs Media & Entertainment Meta Microsoft Privacy Robotics Security Social Space Startups TikTok Transportation Venture More from TechCrunch Staff Events Startup Battlefield StrictlyVC Newsletters Podcasts Videos Partner Content TechCrunch Brand Studio Crunchboard Contact Us Image Credits: Yujie Chen / Getty Images AI Midjourney wants Hollywood studios to reveal the details of their AI usage Anthony Ha 11:00 AM PDT · July 4, 2026 As part of an ongoing legal dispute with three Hollywood studios, AI startup Midjourney is seeking to compel those studios to reveal how they use AI themselves.

Disney and Universal sued Midjourney for alleged copyright infringement last year, noting that the startup’s image-generation models could create images of characters, such as Bart Simpson and Darth Vader, who are owned by the studios. A few months later, Warner Bros. sued Midjourney as well. The startup argues that training its AI models on images of copyrighted characters is permitted under fair use.

The current dispute revolves around the documentation the studios will need to produce during the discovery process. A judge previously ruled that the studios would indeed have to provide information about their generative AI usage – but only when it led to “consumer-facing” videos and images.

In its latest filing , Midjourney seeks to overturn that limitation, arguing that it “unfairly” allows the studios “to cherry-pick only those documents they believe support their market harm claims while depriving Midjourney of documents that would support its defenses.” Midjourney goes on to claim that the “documents [the studios] are withholding are precisely those that would reveal whether, behind closed doors, they are doing exactly what they are suing Midjourney for doing.” For example, the startup says that if the studios are developing image-generating AI models “for internal use in storyboarding or ideating content for film or TV, that evidence would equally demonstrate that it is an industry custom, even among the studios themselves, to download and train AI on unlicensed copyrighted content.” In the filing, the startup also argues that the studios should reveal all the prompts they used in Midjourney, as well as the resulting outputs, not just the prompts that produced the allegedly infringing images.

The studios’ lead attorney David Singer previously claimed Midjourney was seeking this documentation as part of a “fishing expedition.” He also said the studios “do not seek to stop AI technology or even shut down Midjourney’s business,” but rather “simply want Midjourney to stop copying their movies and TV shows and to stop distributing, publicly displaying, publicly performing, and creating derivative works that include copies of [their] famous characters without authorization.” Topics AI , Disney , Media & Entertainment , MidJourney , Universal , Warner Bros When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission .

This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Anthony Ha Anthony Ha is TechCrunch’s weekend editor. Previously, he worked as a tech reporter at Adweek, a senior editor at VentureBeat, a local government reporter at the Hollister Free Lance, and vice president of content at a VC firm. He lives in New York City.

You can contact or verify outreach from Anthony by emailing [email protected] . View Bio November 4 Boston Last chance to save up to $190 on TechCrunch Founder Summit. Join 1,000+ founders and VCs at all stages for real-world scaling insights and connections that move the needle. Savings end June 26, 11:59 p.m.

PT . REGISTER NOW Most Popular Chevy built an all-American EV truck — why is nobody buying it?

Tim De Chant After $18B IPO, Bending Spoons founder says success comes from minimizing luck Anna Heim The ‘Father of the Internet’ is finally retiring Tim Fernholz OpenClaw is finally available on Android and iOS Lucas Ropek Flipper Device’s new Busy Bar is a customizable display for productivity Ivan Mehta Ford rehires ‘gray beard’ engineers after AI falls short Anthony Ha Govee’s smart nugget ice maker makes every iced drink feel like a luxury Aisha Malik Loading the next article Error loading the next article X LinkedIn Facebook Instagram youTube Mastodon Threads Bluesky TechCrunch Staff Contact Us Advertise Crunchboard Jobs Site Map Terms of Service Privacy Policy RSS Terms of Use Code of Conduct SpaceX IPO Anthropic Cursor Snap Fable 5 Tech Layoffs ChatGPT © 2026 TechCrunch Media LLC.